Who’s to Blame For Failed ERP Venture that Prompted SAP Lawsuit?

Share Article

It is a harmless bet that executives of Waste Management, the company suing SAP for $100 million more than a failed ERP implementation, hadn’t browse the MIT Sloan Management Evaluation post penned by Cynthia Rettig in which she describes ERP programs as “enormous programs, with millions of traces of code, 1000’s of installation solutions and countless interrelated parts.”

In an report, which I wrote about again in August, Rettig point outs that a standard ERP implementation “introduce(s) so many elaborate, tough specialized and small business concerns that just producing it to the finish line with one’s shirt on (is) regarded a acquire.”

If they experienced, would they have bought SAP’s alleged pitch that the procedure it offered to Waste Administration was “an ‘out-of-the-box’ remedy that would meet up with Waste Management’s wants without having any customization or enhancements,” one that could be entirely applied during the organization inside of of 18 months? Highly uncertain.

According to a statement cited in an ITWorld.com posting, Squander Management statements SAP deceived it by producing “phony application environments” for item demonstrations. The venture went poor just about quickly right after a revenue settlement was signed in October of 2005. Nevertheless SAP promised a pilot version of the program would be up and functioning by Dec. 15, 2006, “it is not even near to currently being accomplished right now.”

The increasingly acrimonious relations between the two corporations included an SAP “Answers Evaluate” that located the computer software did not meet up with Waste Management’s requirements and a failed exertion at consensual mediation. Waste Management contends that it rejected SAP’s recommendation that it would have to “start in excess of” with an updated version of the SAP platform if it ever hoped to implement the application all over the company. According to its statement, which is cited in ITWorld.com:

“SAP’s 2007 proposal is exactly the sort of risky, expensive and time-consuming undertaking that Squander Management turned down from other corporations two decades earlier. Certainly, the enhancement venture that SAP proposed would substantially lengthen the implementation timetable from the original December 2007 stop-day to an stop-date someday in 2010 without having any assurance of achievement.”

As with most any failed romantic relationship, nonetheless, it seems as if the “wronged” social gathering may possibly also want to take some accountability. In accordance to a SearchSAP.com blog site, Squander Administration may well have had unrealistic expectations that the software package could correct all of its challenges, which provided a wholesale firing of its administration workforce and appointment of new executives following a fiscal scandal.

Squander Administration “experienced a great deal on its plate at when,” writes blogger Demir Barlas. Definitely, using on an ERP implementation even though in the midst of this sort of a major transition appears to be unwise. A little bit of perfunctory study really should have clued Squander Management to ERP’s standing for complexity.

Barlas also concerns – and rightfully so – Squander Management’s seller evaluation procedure and ongoing management of the SAP relationship. Barlas writes:

“More pertinently, how could these details about the application be “unidentified” to administration? ERP implementations can choose yrs, and are accompanied by demanding tests and arranging. If SAP’s software is indeed a “total failure,” Waste Management’s executives might properly have been asleep at the wheel no one particular must fork out $100 million and hold out two years to locate out they’ve acquired a faulty solution.”

The even larger challenge here is that conventional ERP units for many corporations show up to be more problems than they are worthy of. That is why nicely-known IT cynic Nicholas Carr instructed – in a submit that I referenced and connected to in August – that Workday and other ERP systems shipped through a program-as-a-service design could be the “stop of ERP as we know it.”

Waste Management is considerably from the only organization to have experienced main ERP pain. IT Business enterprise Edge blogger Susan Corridor wrote about the Los Angeles College District’s tale of ERP woe in Oct. Nine months after implementing a $95 million ERP method from SAP, hundreds of personnel had been acquiring incorrect paychecks, with some receiving too a great deal and many others not enough, and the mistakes generating probable tax difficulties for the district.

You might also like


What Does a Family Mediator Do?

Recently, a friend called from out of town and asked me about mediation. He and his wife are getting divorced, and he was having a

10 Ways to Improve Family Law Courts

The current model responsible for governing family law courts is extremely outdated and archaic. It is governed by a 1950’s chauvinistic view towards marriage and